Skip to main content
Revelle Capital

Transaction Type

Unitranche Financing Through Private Credit

One lender, one facility, one set of documents. Unitranche financing combines senior and subordinated debt into a single tranche, eliminating intercreditor complexity and delivering execution speed that multi-tranche structures cannot match.

300+Lenders
15+Years Experience
100+Clients Served
10+Jurisdictions Covered

What Is Unitranche Financing?

Unitranche financing is a single-tranche debt facility that combines the characteristics of senior secured lending and subordinated debt into one instrument. Instead of arranging separate senior and mezzanine facilities with different lenders, different pricing, different covenants, and an intercreditor agreement governing their relationship, a unitranche facility provides the entire debt package through a single lender with blended pricing that reflects the combined risk profile.

The concept originated in the US mid-market in the early 2000s and crossed the Atlantic to Europe in the years following the global financial crisis. It has since become the dominant structure in European private credit, accounting for roughly 70-80% of direct lending origination by volume. The product's growth has been driven by its simplicity and the execution advantages it offers relative to multi-tranche alternatives.

Structurally, a unitranche facility is documented as a single facilities agreement between the borrower and the lender or a small club. The pricing is expressed as a single margin over the reference rate, blending the lower cost of senior risk with the higher cost of subordinated risk. For a typical mid-market unitranche, the blended margin might be EURIBOR/SONIA + 575-700 bps, compared to EURIBOR + 425 bps for standalone senior and 12-14% total return for standalone mezzanine.

Behind the scenes, some unitranche facilities involve an internal first-out/last-out arrangement that allocates risk and return between different pools of capital within the same manager's platform. This internal arrangement is invisible to the borrower, who deals with a single counterparty throughout. Other unitranche facilities are genuinely single-tranche, with one pool of capital absorbing all the risk. The distinction matters to the lender's fund economics but not to the borrower's experience.

When to Use This Structure

Unitranche financing is suited to a wide range of transaction types, but its advantages are most pronounced in situations where execution speed, documentary simplicity, and lender certainty are valued by the borrower and its sponsors.

PE-sponsored buyouts where the target leverage sits in the 4.0-5.5x range - high enough to require subordinated risk capacity but not so high that a separate mezzanine tranche is needed
Competitive auction processes where a fully committed, single-lender financing package eliminates execution risk and differentiates the bid from competing offers reliant on multi-lender structures
Transactions on compressed timelines where eliminating intercreditor negotiation saves 2-4 weeks compared to a senior-plus-mezzanine structure
Buy-and-build strategies where documentation needs to accommodate future bolt-on acquisitions through incremental facilities and permitted acquisition baskets
Cross-border transactions where a single facility across multiple jurisdictions avoids the complexity of coordinating separate senior and mezzanine lenders in each market
Refinancings where simplifying the existing capital structure from multiple tranches to a single unitranche reduces administrative burden
Situations where the borrower values a single relationship counterparty for the life of the facility, avoiding the dynamics of managing two lenders with potentially divergent interests
Growth-stage technology businesses where recurring revenue metrics support higher leverage than traditional EBITDA-based senior lending would allow

How It Works

The unitranche financing process benefits from its inherent simplicity. With a single lender and a single set of documentation, the path from engagement to funding is materially shorter than for multi-tranche alternatives. Typical timelines run 4-6 weeks for mid-market transactions.

1

Sizing and Structuring

The adviser works with the sponsor to determine the appropriate leverage level and whether unitranche is the optimal structure. Key considerations include the target leverage (unitranche is most efficient at 4.0-5.5x), the transaction size (unitranche lenders can typically hold EUR 30-500M+), and whether additional structural features such as revolving credit facilities, delayed draw tranches, or capex facilities are needed. If total leverage above 5.5x is required, a unitranche-plus-mezzanine or senior-plus-mezzanine structure may be more appropriate.

2

Lender Selection and Process

A shortlist of 3-5 direct lending platforms with unitranche capability is assembled based on sector expertise, hold size, pricing expectations, and geographic mandate. The adviser shares a credit memorandum under NDA and manages the competitive term sheet process. Not all direct lenders offer genuine unitranche capability - some can only provide senior secured facilities and would need a mezzanine partner, reintroducing the intercreditor complexity that unitranche is designed to eliminate.

3

Term Sheet Negotiation

Lenders submit indicative unitranche term sheets within 1-2 weeks. The adviser benchmarks proposals across margin, leverage, covenant structure, permitted baskets, call protection, and commitment fees. Because unitranche terms are expressed as a single blended package, comparison across lenders is more straightforward than for multi-tranche structures. After bilateral negotiations, a preferred lender is selected and proceeds to credit committee for a committed term sheet.

4

Due Diligence and Documentation

Confirmatory due diligence and documentation drafting proceed in parallel. The documentation consists of a single facilities agreement, security documents across relevant jurisdictions, and ancillary documents. There is no intercreditor agreement to negotiate - one of the most significant time savings relative to a multi-tranche structure. If an RCF is provided alongside the unitranche by a separate bank, a simplified super-senior intercreditor is required, but far less complex than a full senior/mezzanine intercreditor.

5

Signing and Funding

With documentation agreed and conditions precedent satisfied, the facility is signed and drawn in a single tranche. There is one drawdown notice, one set of funding mechanics, and one set of ongoing reporting obligations. Post-completion, the borrower services a single facility with a single margin, files reports with a single lender, and engages with a single counterparty on any amendments, waivers, or additional facilities required.

Typical Terms

Unitranche terms reflect the blended risk profile of the combined senior and subordinated exposure within a single tranche. The following ranges represent current European mid-market conditions for unitranche financing.

Leverage
4.0-5.5x EBITDA
The sweet spot for unitranche; above 5.5x, a separate mezzanine tranche is typically needed
Blended Margin
EURIBOR/SONIA + 550-725 bps
Reflects blended senior and subordinated risk; quality credits with strong recurring revenue at the lower end
EURIBOR/SONIA Floor
0-50 bps
Most current unitranche facilities include a 0% floor
Original Issue Discount
98-99 (1-2% OID)
Effectively increases the all-in yield to the lender; more common in competitive processes
Arrangement Fee
1.5-2.5%
Payable at drawdown; reflects origination and legal costs
Tenor
6-7 years bullet
No scheduled amortisation is standard; bullet maturity aligned with PE holding period
Call Protection
101-102 in Year 1, par thereafter
Protects lender minimum return; some lenders negotiate 102/101/par over three years
Excess Cash Flow Sweep
50% above leverage threshold
Typically 50% ECF sweep above 4.5x, stepping to 25% below 4.0x
Financial Covenants
Springing leverage covenant
Tested only when RCF drawn above 40%; set with 30-40% headroom above base case projections
Security Package
All-asset first-priority security
Share pledges, debentures, account charges across the borrower group
RCF Alongside
10-15% of total facilities
Revolving credit facility typically provided by a bank alongside the unitranche with super-senior ranking
Equity Cure Rights
2-3 cures over facility life
Sponsor can inject equity to cure covenant breaches; cures typically count as EBITDA

Structuring a Transaction?

We advise borrowers on private credit structures across European markets. Share your deal parameters and we will map the lender landscape.

Get Structuring Advice

Private Credit vs Bank Lending

The comparison for unitranche financing is less about private credit versus banks and more about unitranche versus multi-tranche structures. Banks do not offer unitranche; they provide senior secured facilities that must be combined with separate mezzanine to achieve equivalent leverage.

Private CreditvsBank Lending
Number of Counterparties
Private CreditSingle lender or 2-3 lender club. One set of negotiations, one relationship to manage, one approval process for amendments and waivers.
Bank LendingMinimum two counterparties (senior bank + mezzanine fund), often more if the senior is syndicated. Multiple relationships with competing priorities.
Intercreditor Complexity
Private CreditNo intercreditor agreement required, or a simple super-senior/unitranche intercreditor if an RCF is provided alongside. Eliminates 2-4 weeks of negotiation.
Bank LendingFull senior/mezzanine intercreditor agreement required, governing payment waterfalls, enforcement rights, standstill periods, and release mechanics.
Execution Timeline
Private Credit4-6 weeks from mandate to funding. Single credit committee, single documentation workstream, no intercreditor negotiation.
Bank Lending8-14 weeks. Separate credit committees for senior and mezzanine. Parallel documentation workstreams plus intercreditor adds 2-4 weeks.
Blended Cost
Private CreditSingle margin of EURIBOR/SONIA + 550-725 bps. Transparent, predictable cost with no hidden intercreditor or coordination costs.
Bank LendingBlended cost of senior (EURIBOR + 400-500 bps) plus mezzanine (12-16% total return) may be similar or higher on a weighted average basis, with added complexity.
Leverage Capacity
Private CreditUp to 5.5x EBITDA in a single tranche. Above this level, unitranche lenders become increasingly selective and pricing rises steeply.
Bank LendingTotal leverage of 6-7x achievable by combining senior (3.5-4.5x) and mezzanine (1.5-2.0x additional). More leverage capacity at the upper end.
Ongoing Administration
Private CreditSingle set of financial reporting, covenant compliance, and amendment requests. One lender for operational updates and strategic decisions.
Bank LendingSeparate reporting and compliance for senior and mezzanine lenders. Amendments may require consent from both tranches with divergent interests.
Enforcement Dynamics
Private CreditSingle lender controls enforcement decisions. No intercreditor disputes about enforcement timing, strategy, or proceeds allocation.
Bank LendingEnforcement rights governed by intercreditor. Mezzanine may have standstill periods. Senior controls enforcement but mezzanine influences timing.
Flexibility for Add-ons
Private CreditIncremental facilities through simple accession mechanics. Single lender approval required. No need to coordinate between senior and mezzanine for each bolt-on.
Bank LendingAdd-on financing requires coordination between senior and mezzanine. Both may need to consent, and the intercreditor may need amendment for new money.

Who Provides Unitranche Financing?

Unitranche financing is the core product of the European direct lending industry. The vast majority of established direct lending platforms originate unitranche facilities as their primary or sole product offering.

Large-Cap Direct Lending Funds - The largest European platforms manage dedicated unitranche strategies with fund sizes exceeding EUR 5 billion. These managers can hold single-name exposures of EUR 200-750M, competing directly with syndicated leveraged loan markets for upper mid-market and large-cap transactions.

Mid-Market Specialists - A deep bench of mid-market direct lending funds provides unitranche facilities for businesses with EBITDA of EUR 10-50M, with typical hold sizes of EUR 30-150M. Many of these managers have sector expertise or geographic focus that differentiates their offering.

Multi-Strategy Credit Platforms - Several larger credit managers offer unitranche alongside other private credit products through different fund vehicles within the same platform. These managers can provide the unitranche and separately offer subordinated capital if higher leverage is needed.

Insurance-Backed Lenders - Insurance companies and their affiliated lending platforms participate in unitranche markets, particularly for lower-leverage, investment-grade-adjacent credits. Their lower cost of capital allows competitive pricing on unitranche facilities with leverage below 4.5x.

Deal Reference: European B2B SaaS Platform Unitranche

Anonymised reference based on comparable transactions seen on the market.

SectorSoftware and Technology
Deal SizeEUR 180M unitranche + EUR 25M super-senior revolving credit facility
Leverage5.2x opening leverage on run-rate adjusted EBITDA of EUR 34.5M. Underwriting supported by 6.0x ARR multiple coverage and strong net revenue retention of 115%, providing confidence in organic deleveraging through revenue expansion.
Tenor7 years bullet maturity. ECF sweep of 50% above 5.0x net leverage, stepping to 25% below 4.0x. Call protection of 102/101/par over first three years.
StructureUnitranche term loan provided by a single direct lending fund to support the PE acquisition of a European B2B SaaS platform with EUR 95M ARR and 92% gross retention. Pricing at EURIBOR + 625 bps with 0% floor. 2.0% arrangement fee. Springing net leverage covenant at 7.5x tested only when RCF drawn above 40%. Permitted acquisition basket of EUR 15M per bolt-on, EUR 40M aggregate annually, subject to pro forma leverage below 5.5x. Delayed draw tranche of EUR 30M for identified product-adjacent acquisition pipeline.
OutcomeThe unitranche structure provided the sponsor with a fully committed financing package within 4 weeks, critical in a competitive auction with three other PE bidders. The single-lender relationship simplified documentation and eliminated intercreditor risk. Within 14 months, the delayed draw funded two product-adjacent acquisitions adding EUR 18M ARR, reducing leverage to 4.4x on a pro forma basis and positioning the platform for further consolidation.

Tell Us About Your Transaction

Share your deal parameters and our team will map the lender landscape. Confidential, no-obligation.

1
Deal Overview
2
Company Profile
3
Contact Details
Confidential
24 Hour Response
No Obligation

Related Private Credit Pages

Explore more private credit topics

Transaction

Acquisition Financing

Overview of acquisition financing through private credit, including unitranche as one of several structural options for funding buyouts and M&A transactions.

Transaction

LBO Financing

How unitranche fits within broader LBO capital structures, including its role as the dominant financing product for PE-sponsored buyouts.

Comparison

Private Credit vs Bank Lending

Comprehensive comparison of private credit and traditional bank lending across cost, flexibility, and execution dimensions.

Sector

Private Credit for Software and Technology

How unitranche structures are tailored for software and technology businesses, including ARR-based leverage and recurring revenue adjustments.

Overview

What Is Private Credit?

Comprehensive overview of private credit covering unitranche as the most widely used product within the direct lending asset class.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about this transaction structure

Unitranche facilities in the European mid-market typically reach leverage of 4.0-5.5x EBITDA. The upper end is reserved for businesses with high-quality recurring revenues, strong cash conversion, and limited cyclicality. Software companies, healthcare services, and contracted business services are typical examples. Above 5.5x, most unitranche lenders become increasingly selective, and pricing premiums rise to a point where a separate senior-plus-mezzanine structure may offer better value despite added complexity.
On a blended basis, unitranche pricing is often competitive with or slightly cheaper than an equivalent senior-plus-mezzanine combination. A unitranche at EURIBOR + 625 bps for 5.0x leverage might compare to senior at EURIBOR + 450 bps for 4.0x combined with mezzanine at 13% total return for the additional 1.0x. When intercreditor costs, reduced legal fees, and single-point administration savings are factored in, unitranche frequently represents better overall value at leverage levels below 5.5x.
Some unitranche facilities involve an internal split where the lender allocates different portions of risk and return to different pools of capital within its platform. The first-out tranche has priority on cash flows and enforcement proceeds, while the last-out tranche absorbs losses first. This arrangement is invisible to the borrower, who signs one facilities agreement, pays one margin, and deals with one counterparty. It is purely a mechanism for the lender to manage risk allocation within its own fund structure.
Yes, this is standard practice. Most unitranche transactions include a revolving credit facility provided by a commercial bank alongside the unitranche lender. The RCF typically represents 10-15% of total committed facilities and ranks as super-senior. The relationship between the unitranche lender and the RCF bank is governed by a simplified super-senior intercreditor agreement. The RCF provides day-to-day liquidity and working capital flexibility while the unitranche provides term debt financing.
The dominant structure in European unitranche is a springing leverage covenant tested only when the revolving credit facility is drawn above 40% of its committed amount. When tested, the covenant is set with 30-40% headroom above base case projections. Equity cure rights are standard, allowing the sponsor to inject equity to remedy a breach. This gives the borrower significant operational flexibility while preserving the lender's ability to engage if the business deteriorates materially.
Unitranche facilities have bullet maturities, meaning the entire principal is due on the maturity date. In practice, the most common outcomes are refinancing into a new facility 12-18 months before maturity, repayment from sale proceeds when the sponsor exits, or an amend-and-extend negotiation with the lender. The alignment between typical unitranche tenors of 6-7 years and PE holding periods of 4-6 years means most facilities are repaid through an exit event.
Unitranche has become a preferred structure for technology businesses, particularly B2B SaaS companies with strong recurring revenue metrics. Direct lenders have developed ARR-based leverage frameworks that can size unitranche facilities at 1.0-2.0x ARR, rather than traditional EBITDA multiples. Net revenue retention above 110%, gross margins above 70%, and low customer concentration are the key metrics that drive unitranche availability for technology credits.

Let Us Find the Right Private Credit Solution

With access to 300+ lenders across Europe, we match borrowers with the capital structures that fit. Confidential, no-obligation initial conversation.